Text Size
Mar 02
English Croatian Serbian Slovak Slovenian

Did God Allow Noah To Eat Meat?

The passage of Genesis 9:2-4 was the subject of great debate and controversy. After years of study and research and virtually leaving no stone unturned on the subject, to date I have not read a commentary on the passage which is worthy of a serious consideration. Generally it is argued that here we have the first biblical passage where God explicitly told Noah that he may kill any animal he wanted to in order to eat its flesh. Even vegetarians who abhor meat eating and who practice vegetarianism on ethical grounds admit that here we are faced with a biblical text which clearly sanctions the killing of animals and eating of their flesh. All they can say is that due to the fallen and corrupt nature of humanity God gave a “concession” concerning meat diet but it was not His ideal as in Genesis 1:30 where God ideally prescribed a completely vegetarian diet. But nothing can be further from the truth.

Main Menu

Who's Online

We have 38 guests online

Did Jesus Eat Fish?

 There is only one passage in the whole of the New Testament where it is explicitly and specifically said that Jesus actually ate meat. If this text is true and genuine and in fact inspired by the Holy Spirit, then it would follow that Jesus was not and could not have been a vegetarian. But if on the other hand it can be satisfactorily demonstrated that this passage in Luke 24 is actually a forgery, then it follows that Jesus must have been a vegetarian, since a lying hand felt a need to insert a lying passage in order to portray Jesus as a carnivorous being.

Sexual Immorality of the Popes PDF Print E-mail
Written by Administrator   
Thursday, 07 May 2009 09:57

 My new book - YAHWEH CONSPIRACY - is now available from amazon.com


Volumes would be needed to describe every illicit act committed by the priests, cardinals, nuns, and the popes of the Roman Catholic Church. Briefly however, I endeavour to demonstrate the monstrous crimes and sexual perversion of the very popes themselves – from the 10th century  onwards. Pope SERGIUS III who reigned between 904 and 911 obtained the office of his pontificate by murder. The records of the Catholic Church tell about his life of open sin with Marozia who bore him several children. The Cardinal Baronius described pope SERGIUS III as a “monster” while Gregorovius called him a “terrorising criminal.”  The grandson of Marozia, when merely eighteen years old succeeded in taking possession of the pontifical throne under the name of JOHN XII. In his book The Priest, the Woman, and the Confessional, Chiniquy, the former Catholic priest, on p. 138 writes: 

“In the year 936, the grandson of the prostitute Marozia, after several bloody encounters with his opponents, succeeded in taking possession of the pontifical throne under the name of John XII. But his vices and scandals became so intolerable, that the learned and celebrated Roman Catholic Bishop of Cremorne, Luitprand, says of him:- “No honest lady dared to show herself in public, for the Pope John had no respect either for single girls, married women, or widows - they were sure to be defiled by him, even on the tombs of the holy apostles, Peter and Paul.” 

The Catholic Encyclopedia itself admits the following facts concerning the monster pope JOHN XII: 

“a coarse, immoral man, whose life was such that lateran was spoken as a brothel, and the moral corruption in Rome became the subject of general odium…On 6 November a synod composed of fifty Italian and German bishops was convened in St. Peter’s: John was accused of sacrilege, simony, perjury, adultery, and incest, and was summoned in writing to defend himself. Refusing to recognize the synod, John pronounced sentence of ex-communication against all participators in the assembly, should they elect in his stead another Pope…John XII took bloody vengeance on the leaders of the opposite party, Cardinal-Deacon John had his right hand struck off, Bishop Otgar of Speyer was scourged, a high Palatine official lost nose and ears…John died on 14th May, 964, eight days after he had been, according to rumor, stricken by paralysis in the act of adultery.” 

The Catholic collection of the lives of popes, the Liber Pontificalis states concerning JOHN XII the following: 

"He spent his entire life in adultery” [Pontificalis, Vol. 2, p. 246]. 

The pope BENEDICT IX who reigned from 1033 to 1045 was made pope when merely twelve years old. Halley, in his Halley’s Bible Handbook on p. 775 says concerning this pope the following: 

“He committed murders and adulteries in broad daylight, robbed pilgrims on the graves of the martyrs, a hideous criminal, the people drove him out of Rome.” 

The Catholic Encyclopedia states: 

“He was a disgrace to the chair of Peter.” 

The pope BONIFACE VIII, is described in the Catholic Encyclopedia, Vol. 2, on pp. 668-669, art. BONIFACE VIII, in the following manner: 

“Scarcely any possible crime was omitted - infidelity, heresy, simony, gross and unnatural immorality, idolatry, magic…historians, generally, and even modern Catholic writers class him among the wicked Popes, as an ambitious, haughty, and unrelenting man, deceitful and also treacherous, his whole pontificate one record of evil.” 

During the reign of BONIFACE VIII, the poet Dante visited Rome and described the Vatican as a sewer of corruption. The Catholic historians admit that BONIFACE VIII spoke offensive phraseology on the public documents. The pope BONIFACE VIII also publicly declared the following: 

“to enjoy oneself and to lie carnally with women or with boys is no more a sin than rubbing one’s hands together” [History of the Church Councils, Book 40, art. 697]. 

Now this monster of a man was in fact the very pope who in 1302 issued a well known UNAM SANCTUM which officially declared that the Roman Catholic Church is the ONLY TRUE CHURCH - outside of which there is no salvation. His declaration is embraced by the faithful flock of Romanism to this very day.  The pope JOHN XXIII was another monster who set on the alleged chair of St. Peter. Chiniquy in his book The Priest, the Woman, and the Confessional on p. 139 gives us the following information regarding this monstrous Holy Father:  

“John XXIII, having appeared before the Council to give an account of his conduct, he was proved by thirty-seven witnesses, the greater part of whom were bishops and priests, of having been guilty of fornication, adultery, incest, sodomy, simony, theft, and murder. It was proved also by a legion of witnesses, that he had seduced and violated 300 nuns. His own secretary, Niem, said that he had at Boulogne, kept a harem, where not less than 200 girls had been the victims of his lubricity.” 

A Vatican record offers this information in relation to his wicked, immoral and monstrous reign: 

"His lordship, Pope JOHN committed perversity with the wife of his brother, intercourse with virgins, adultery with the married, and all sorts of sex crimes…wholly adverse to the life and teaching of Christ,,,he was publicly called the Devil incarnate” [Sacorum Conciliorum, Vol. 27, p. 663]. 

The pope ALEXANDER VI is regarded as most wicked and corrupt of the Renaissance popes. He lived in public incest with his two sisters and his own daughter LUCRETIA, from whom he had a child. In October 1501 he conducted a sex orgy in the Vatican, the equal of which for sheer horror was probably never duplicated in the annals of human history. The Protestant Reformer Martin Luther, while still a Catholic priest, visited Rome. As he caught the glimpse of the seven-hilled city, he fell to the ground and said: 

“Holy Rome, I salute thee.” 

He did not have to spend much time in Rome - that is, in VATICAN where the pope was situated - to find out that Rome was anything but a Holy City. He soon discovered that iniquity and immorality existed among all classes of the clergy. He discovered that many priests told indecent jokes even while serving at the Mass. The papal court was served at supper by TWELVE NAKED GIRLS. He was shocked and dumbfounded. He used to chastise himself and even whip himself when he committed minor sins. But here at the heart of Vatican, in the presence of pope himself - nudism was rampant. [For verification of this story please see Durant, The Story of Civilization, Reformation, p. 344].  Pope GREGORY XVI who reigned from 1831 to 1846 had several mistresses, one of whom was the wife of his barber. He was one of the greatest drunkards in Italy. Pope PIUS IX who reigned from 1846 to 1878 also had several mistresses. Two daughters were born to him from two of his mistresses. It is hardly surprising that the popes, cardinals, bishops, priests etc. were and still are guilty of such gross illicit sexual acts. They are nothing more than the PRIESTS OF BACHUS. Chiniquy writes: 

“However, nobody can be surprised that the priests, the bishops, and the popes of Rome are sunk into such a bottomless abyss of infamy, when we remember that they are nothing else than the successors of the priests of Bacchus and Jupiter. For not only have they inherited their powers, but they have even kept their very robes and mantles on their shoulders, and their caps on their heads. Like the priests of Bacchus, the priests of the Pope are bound never to marry, by the impious and godless law of celibacy. For every one knows that the priests of Bacchus were, as the priests of Rome, celibates. But, like the priests of the Pope, the priests of Bacchus, to console themselves for the restraints of celibacy, had invented auricular confession. Through the secret confidences of the confessional, the priests of the old idols, as well as those of the newly-invented wafer gods, knew who were strong and weak among their penitents, and under the veil of the sacred mysteries, during the night celebration of their diabolical mysteries, they knew to whom they should address themselves, and make their vows of celibacy an easy yoke.” 

It was not my intention to deliberately offend the Roman Catholics. I merely presented the historical facts which are even admitted and recognised by the Romish official sources. I merely wanted to show that even if the original pope was indeed a real and legitimate successor os Apostle Peter - that chain of succession was broken and destroyed by the wicked and monstrous popes. My Catholic friend, the greatest favour you can do to yourself and your immediate family is to simply walk out from the Romish Church  - which in reality upholds the ancient Babylon Mystery Religion - and embrace the faith of the ancient Ebionites - the true and legitimate followers of Jesus.           

Comments (4)Add Comment
written by Alex, November 19, 2011
Did you make a mistake? Pope John XXIII ruled in the 1960s I believe
written by administrator/John, November 21, 2011
John XXIII I referred to ruled in the 14th century but is regarded as antipope by the Catholic Church and should not be confused with John XXIII that you are referring to. Thanks for the comment anyway.
written by Romy of Philippines, April 20, 2012
I agree of what you had research administrator!bravo.I already read those books of them.All I have to say is "the catholic church s the home of all crimes and immorality.
written by john r., December 06, 2014
smilies/angry.gif Maybe morality has its own evolving history. Could it be that there was a time when people saw a thing as sinful, and not considered sinful at another time? I might be wrong, but what do other FB guys think?

Write comment

Last Updated on Tuesday, 18 October 2016 10:46